You are here

Home

NLP Library

Found 73 results
Author Title [ Type(Desc)] Year
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is B  [Clear All Filters]
Conference Paper
Blooma M J, Chua A Y K, Goh D H-L, Keong L C.  2009.  A Trend Analysis of the Question Answering Domain. Sixth International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations. :1522–1527.
Lindén K, Pirinen T.  2009.  Weighted Finite-State Morphological Analysis of Finnish Compounding with HFST-LEXC. Nordic Conference of Computational Linguistics NODALIDA 2009.
Journal Article
Hauch V, Blandón-Gitlin I, Masip J, Sporer SL.  2014.  Are Computers Effective Lie Detectors? A Meta-Analysis of Linguistic Cues to Deception Personality and Social Psychology Review.
Pyysalo S, Ginter F, Heimonen J, Björne J, Boberg J, Järvinen J, Salakoski T.  2007.  BioInfer: a corpus for information extraction in the biomedical domain. BMC Bioinformatics. 8:50.
Pyysalo S, Ginter F, Heimonen J, Björne J, Boberg J, Järvinen J, Salakoski T.  2007.  BioInfer: a corpus for information extraction in the biomedical domain. BMC Bioinformatics. 8:50.
Theijssen D, Bosch Lten, Boves L, Cranen B, van Halteren H.  2013.  Choosing alternatives: Using Bayesian Networks and memory-based learning to study the dative alternation. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. :1–36.
Theijssen D, Bosch Lten, Boves L, Cranen B, van Halteren H.  2013.  Choosing alternatives: Using Bayesian Networks and memory-based learning to study the dative alternation. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. :1–36.
Brandt P, Fuß E.  2017.  A corpus-based analysis of pronoun choice in German relative clauses. Belgian Journal of Linguistics. 31:194-217.
Theijssen D, van Halteren H, Boves L, Oostdijk N.  2011.  On the difficulty of making concreteness concrete. Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands (CLIN 21). :61-77.
Rello L, Ferraro G, Burga A.  2011.  Error Analysis for the Improvement of Subject Ellipsis Detection. Procesamiento de Lenguaje Natural. 47
Theijssen D, Boves L, van Halteren H, Oostdijk N.  2011.  Evaluating automatic annotation: automatically detecting and enriching instances of the dative alternation. Language Resources and Evaluation. :1-36.
Pyysalo S, Ginter F, Pahikkala T, Boberg J, Järvinen J, Salakoski T.  2006.  Evaluation of two dependency parsers on biomedical corpus targeted at protein–protein interactions. International journal of medical informatics. 75(6):430-442.
Carlson L, Bontcheva K, Järvinen T, Soininen M, Tapanainen P, Huovila K, Hyvönen K, Rapinoja P.  2001.  The Incredible Machine: English-Finnish Machine Translation from Prefabricated Components.
Corral A, Boleda G, Ferrer-i-Cancho R.  2015.  Zipf’s Law for Word Frequencies: Word Forms versus Lemmas in Long Texts. PLoS ONE. 10(7):e0129031.
Miscellaneous
Perkiö J, Buntine W, Perttu S.  2004.  Exploring Independent Trends in a Topic-Based Search Engine.
Kupietz M, Belica C, Keibel H, Witt A.  2010.  The German Reference Corpus DEREKO: A Primordial Sample for Linguistic Research.
Lüngen H, Bärenfänger M, Hilbert M, Lobin H, Puskás C.  2006.  Text Parsing of a Complex Genre.
Patent
Sanfilippo A, Cowell AJ, Gregory M, Baddeley B, Paulson PR, Tratz S, Hohimer RE.  2007.  Hypothesis analysis methods, hypothesis analysis devices, and articles of manufacture .
Sanfilippo A, Tratz S, Gregory M, Chappell AR, Whitney PD, Posse C, Baddeley B, Hohimer RE.  2005.  Methods of defining ontologies, word disambiguation methods, computer systems, and articles of manufacture.
Presentation
Bick E.  2009.  The use of semantic prototypes in semantic role annotation.
Report
Boonthum C, Toida S, Levinstein IB.  2003.  Paraphrasing Recognition through Conceptual Graphs.
Thesis
Bingel J.  2015.  Instantiation and Implementation of a Corpus Query Lingua Franca. Department of Computational Linguistics. Masters:78.
Brunet MK.  2009.  Why Bullying Victims are Not Believed: Differentiating Between Children’s True and Fabricated Reports of Stressful and Non-stressful Events. Human Development and Applied Psychology. Master of Arts

Pages